Reality of Narendra Modi | How Indians were Fooled! | Dhruv Rathee

Summary

The video script critiques the cult of personality surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, questioning the authenticity of his humble origins and portraying him as a deity. It highlights alleged inconsistencies in Modi's narratives, such as his claims of poverty, use of luxury items, and avoidance of press conferences, contrasting them with his public image. The script also addresses the emotional manipulation and brainwashing of the public through media, the promotion of a Hindu-centric agenda, and the comparison of political opponents as incompetent, urging viewers to challenge the propaganda and vote against hate and lies.

Takeaways

• 🧐 The script questions the authenticity of Narendra Modi's humble beginnings, suggesting discrepancies between his claims and available evidence.
• 🕶 It highlights the lavish lifestyle of a supposed 'holy beggar', pointing out the contrast between Modi's public image and his expensive possessions like sunglasses and luxury cars.
• 🤔 The speaker criticizes the emotional manipulation and brainwashing of the public through the portrayal of Modi as a savior figure, despite his alleged failures and controversial actions.
• 📚 The script discusses the exaggeration of Modi's childhood poverty and the use of this narrative as a political tool to connect with the masses.
• 👥 It points out the irony of Modi's public persona as someone who abandoned his family for the nation, while still engaging in social events with celebrities and wealthy individuals.
• 💡 The video script accuses the BJP and its supporters of distorting Hindu religious narratives to further a divisive and hateful agenda.
• 🚫 It condemns the use of religion for political gain, including the false attribution of quotes and the manipulation of religious iconography to incite violence.
• 🗳️ The speaker calls for vigilance against the spread of misinformation and hate speech, urging viewers to participate in the democratic process and vote against such tactics.
• 🌐 The script mentions the extensive use of media and advertising by the government to maintain a constant public presence for Modi, raising questions about the use of public funds for this purpose.
• 🤝 It suggests that Modi's reluctance to engage in open debates or unscripted interviews indicates a lack of transparency and intellectual confidence.
• 🏛️ Finally, the script emphasizes the importance of protecting democracy and the constitution by voting and spreading awareness about the issues discussed.

Q & A

What is the claim made by the speaker about Narendra Modi's early life?

The speaker claims that Narendra Modi's portrayal as a 'holy beggar' and his story of selling tea in his childhood have been exaggerated and are part of an emotional manipulation to connect with the public.

What evidence does the speaker provide to question Modi's claims of extreme poverty?

The speaker points to Modi's childhood pictures showing him in good clothing, his not-so-poor-looking family home, and the fact that his father could afford to send Modi and his siblings to school, suggesting that the family was not extremely poor.

How does the speaker describe the speaker's view on the influence of Modi's family on his political image?

The speaker suggests that Modi's portrayal of having abandoned his family for the nation is used as a selling point to enhance his image, despite the fact that he attends high-profile events and has been seen with his mother.

What is the speaker's perspective on the comparison of Modi to a 'holy beggar'?

The speaker challenges this image by pointing out the inconsistencies, such as Modi's expensive sunglasses and his travels in a luxury Mercedes, which do not align with the lifestyle of a 'holy beggar'.

What does the speaker say about the impact of emotional manipulation and brainwashing on the public?

The speaker argues that the public has been subjected to large-scale brainwashing through emotional manipulation, leading to a cult of personality around Modi, where people are made to believe in his divine-like status and infallibility.

How does the speaker characterize the BJP's strategy in the video?

The speaker characterizes the BJP's strategy as one of emotional manipulation, using pride, victimization, fear, and the portrayal of Modi as a messiah to control and influence the public's perception.

What is the speaker's view on the comparison of Modi to God by some of his followers?

The speaker criticizes this comparison, arguing that it is part of a larger pattern of deifying political figures to manipulate the public and that such comparisons are inappropriate and misleading.

What examples does the speaker provide to illustrate the discrepancy between Modi's public image and his actions?

The speaker provides examples such as Modi's frequent outfit changes, his attendance at celebrity weddings, and his presence at the engagements of wealthy individuals, which contrast with the image of a 'holy beggar'.

How does the speaker describe the role of the media in shaping Modi's image?

The speaker suggests that the media, including social media platforms and pro-government news channels, play a significant role in perpetuating Modi's image through constant visibility and selective portrayal of his actions and statements.

What is the speaker's opinion on the effectiveness of the 'Modi magic' in the current political climate?

The speaker believes that the 'Modi magic' is fading, as evidenced by the BJP's need to recruit politicians from other parties and the public's growing skepticism and resistance to the manipulation and propaganda.

What is the speaker's call to action for the audience?

The speaker encourages the audience to continue spreading awareness, sharing information, and voting against hate and lies to protect democracy and the Constitution.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Questioning Modi's Origins and BJP's Influence

The paragraph delves into the skepticism surrounding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's humble beginnings, contrasting the image of a 'holy beggar' with the lavish lifestyle he leads, including expensive sunglasses and a Mercedes. It highlights the blind devotion of BJP supporters, exemplified by a worker named Mangal Vajpayee, who despite living in poverty without basic amenities, firmly believes in Modi's divine status. The script criticizes the emotional manipulation and brainwashing of the public by the BJP, accusing them of distorting Hindu religion to push a divisive agenda. It also discusses the impact of this manipulation on the electorate's perception of Modi and the political climate in India.

05:01

🧐 Unveiling Modi's Exaggerated Claims and Crony Capitalism

This paragraph scrutinizes the authenticity of Narendra Modi's claims of poverty during his childhood and his family's status, suggesting that his portrayal as a 'tea seller' is a misrepresentation. It points out inconsistencies in Modi's narrative, such as his affluent upbringing and the financial capability of his father to support his education. The script also addresses the Elector Bond scam and the widening income inequality in India, implicating crony capitalists who have profited under Modi's rule, while the poor have been left behind. It contrasts Modi's image as a self-made man with the reality of his political and financial connections.

10:02

🏚️ The Facade of Modi's Poverty and the Reality of Inequality

The paragraph discusses the lengths to which the government goes to hide poverty from the public eye, such as building walls during the Namaste Trump event and using green screens during the G20 summit. It criticizes Modi's personal branding as coming from a 'poor family' while pointing out his attendance at high-profile events and the disparity between his public image and the experiences of the poor. The script also touches on Modi's family life, questioning the portrayal of his abandonment of his family as an act of service to the nation, and the negative impact of this narrative on societal values.

15:03

👥 Modi's Isolated Family Life and the Cult of Personality

This paragraph examines the personal life of Narendra Modi, focusing on his estrangement from his immediate family and the portrayal of this as a virtue. It contrasts the traditional Indian values of family unity with Modi's public persona, which is often presented as self-sacrificing for the nation. The script also addresses the media's role in perpetuating Modi's image and the public's growing skepticism of his cult of personality, highlighting instances where Modi's family members were excluded from significant events and their own accounts of being kept at a distance.

20:05

🕶️ The Disparity Between Modi's Holy Beggar Image and Lavish Lifestyle

The paragraph highlights the incongruity between Modi's self-proclaimed status as a 'holy beggar' and his opulent lifestyle, which includes expensive sunglasses and frequent changes of attire. It questions the credibility of Modi's claims of surviving on charity and his alleged use of a digital camera before its commercial release. The script also points out the absurdity of comparing Modi to divine figures, given his extravagant lifestyle and the adulation he receives from some supporters, including the construction of temples in his honor.

25:07

📰 The Overexposure of Modi's Image and the Backlash Against Propaganda

This paragraph discusses the saturation of Narendra Modi's image in media and public spaces, from newspapers to petrol pump hoardings, and the significant government spending on advertisements featuring him. It addresses the public's growing fatigue with this overexposure and the questions being raised about Modi's ability to address real issues, such as violence in Manipur. The script also mentions the BJP's recruitment of politicians with corruption allegations, suggesting a decline in the perceived effectiveness of 'Modi Magic' and the need for the party to resort to other tactics to win elections.

Keywords

💡Faqir

A 'faqir' is a term used in Islamic and South Asian cultures to denote a person who has renounced material attachments and leads a spiritual life, often begging for sustenance. In the video, the term is used to highlight the discrepancy between the humble image some politicians project and their actual lavish lifestyles, as exemplified by the mention of a beggar wearing expensive sunglasses.

💡Cult of Personality

A 'cult of personality' refers to the excessive adoration or glorification of a single leader, often seen in authoritarian regimes. The video discusses how the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's image is excessively promoted, creating a cult-like following among some supporters, which is a key theme in the video's critique of his leadership.

💡Demonetisation

Demonetisation is the process of stripping a currency unit of its status as legal tender, rendering it invalid as a medium of exchange. The video mentions how PM Modi's mother had to stand in line during the demonetisation policy, indicating the hardships faced by ordinary citizens due to sudden economic decisions.

💡Electoral Bond Scam

The 'Electoral Bond Scam' refers to allegations of corruption in the financing of political parties through electoral bonds, which critics argue can be used to funnel illicit funds. The video uses this term to illustrate the perceived corruption within the political system and the crony capitalism that benefits a few at the expense of the many.

💡Inflation

Inflation is the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services is rising, and subsequently, purchasing power is falling. The video mentions the issue of inflation to highlight the economic challenges faced by the poor and the middle class in India, and how it affects their daily lives.

💡Unemployment

Unemployment refers to the state of being without a job while actively seeking work. The video criticizes the lack of employment opportunities in India, suggesting that the government has failed to address this critical issue, which is a significant concern for the population.

💡Ramayana

The 'Ramayana' is one of the major Sanskrit epics of ancient India, depicting the life and virtues of the hero Rama. The video discusses how the narrative of the Ramayana is being distorted by certain political factions to fit their divisive agendas, showing how religious texts can be manipulated for political ends.

💡MGNREGA

The 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act' (MGNREGA) is a social security act that aims to provide employment and income to rural households. The video contrasts the government's largesse towards certain industrialists with the support provided to the poor through schemes like MGNREGA, critiquing the government's priorities.

💡Adani

Gautam Adani is an Indian business magnate who heads the Adani Group, which has interests in various industries. The video mentions Adani as an example of an industrialist who has allegedly profited immensely under PM Modi's administration, suggesting a preferential treatment of certain business interests over the welfare of the general populace.

💡Media Manipulation

Media manipulation refers to the control or influence over the media to shape public opinion in a certain direction. The video talks about how the pervasive presence of PM Modi in various media forms is part of a strategy to dominate public consciousness and maintain a favorable image, regardless of actual governance outcomes.

💡Hate Speech

Hate speech is any speech, conduct, writing, or expression that offends, threatens, or insults individuals based on attributes such as race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, or disability. The video criticizes instances where political rhetoric has incited hatred and division within society, contrasting this with the principles of tolerance and inclusivity that are often associated with religious and moral teachings.

💡Citizenship

Citizenship refers to the status of a person recognized under the law, entailing rights, responsibilities, and protections. The video mentions the high number of people renouncing their Indian citizenship as an indicator of dissatisfaction with the current political climate and governance, underscoring a lack of faith in the country's direction.

Highlights

A faqir (holy beggar) is questioned for his lavish lifestyle including expensive sunglasses and a Mercedes, contrasting with Narendra Modi's claims of poverty.

Narendra Modi's childhood narrative of selling tea is scrutinized for authenticity, with critics pointing out inconsistencies in his family's economic status.

The influence of emotional manipulation and brainwashing on a large scale within the country is discussed, with a focus on the BJP's tactics.

Mangal Vajpayee, a BJP worker, voices his unwavering support for the BJP despite personal hardships and lack of basic amenities.

The contortion of Hindu religion to push a hateful agenda is highlighted, with examples of how it's being used for political gains.

Narendra Modi's claims of extreme poverty in his upbringing are challenged through photographic evidence and family accounts.

The role of media and propaganda in shaping Narendra Modi's image as a selfless leader who abandoned his family for the nation is critiqued.

Anecdotes of Narendra Modi attending high-profile events contrast with his image as a person who left behind personal ties for national service.

The disparity between Narendra Modi's public image and his family's experiences, suggesting a curated narrative of personal sacrifice.

Narendra Modi's portrayal as a 'holy beggar' is contrasted with his affluent lifestyle, including expensive sunglasses and a luxurious car.

The political strategy of comparing Narendra Modi to divine figures and the construction of temples in his honor is critiqued.

The influence of WhatsApp and social media in spreading manipulated narratives and the impact on public perception.

The comparison of Narendra Modi's communication style, avoiding press conferences and unscripted interviews, with Rahul Gandhi's more interactive approach.

The extensive advertising campaigns and media presence of Narendra Modi, questioning the use of public funds for such purposes.

The growing public skepticism towards Narendra Modi's 'cult of personality' and the diminishing impact of his media saturation.

The call to action for viewers to participate in democracy by voting and spreading awareness against hate and lies.

An invitation for a one-on-one debate between Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi, with Rahul's acceptance and Modi's silence.

The final remarks urging viewers to continue their mission to counteract misinformation and protect democracy.

Transcripts

"I'm a faqir (holy beggar),

I'll leave with only the bare minimum."

But have you seen a beggar anywhere in the world,

who wears sunglasses worth ₹140,000?

And goes around in ₹120 million Mercedes.

He went on foreign tours on what he received as charity,

and bought a digital camera,

before the digital camera was released.

And Narendra Modi claims to be from an extremely poor family.

"In my childhood,

I used to sell tea in trains."

That's otherworldly.

"He is our God,

we worship him."

Friends, the truth is that

they have started contorting our Hindu religion,

to push their hateful agenda.

Hello, friends!

Journalist Anil Yadav was talking to BJP worker Mangal Vajpayee in Kanpur.

Mangal works as a loader.

He loads goods on vehicles.

"What's your name?" "-Mangal Vajpayee."

"Mangal Vajpayee.

And you work as a loader."

Additionally, he volunteers for BJP MLA Mahesh Trivedi.

He was expressing his belief that this time BJP will win more than 400 seats.

"Who will win the election?"

"BJP will win with more than 400 seats."

But as the interview goes on, Mangal talks about his difficulties in life.

He says that he has to live without electricity.

There's no sewer system.

"We don't have electricity at home.

We don't have a toilet at home.

We aren't connected to the sewer system."

He complained about it to BJP MLA Mahesh Trivedi multiple times,

"I told this to Mahesh Trivedi many times,

that a 20-foot pipe needs to be installed.

If that happens, our home will be connected to the sewer system.

It hasn't happened yet."

Neither did he get anything, nor does he expect anything.

"You are an example of someone

-who didn't get anything. -I didn't get anything.

But despite that

-you have no complaints. -I have no complaints.

And neither do you expect to get it now.

No hope at all."

But he still calls himself a devotee of BJP.

"It's said that a hungry person cannot even pray properly."

To this, Mangal Vajpayee replied, that it's wrong.

A person can satiate their hunger even with sand.

Even with mud.

"Everything is possible."

"If one is devoted enough, everything is possible"

"He eats sand if he is hungry."

He has no complaints.

He believes Prime Minister Modi to be God.

Worships him.

How have people become so blind about a politician?

And he isn't the only one.

I showed you other examples in the last video.

"If I dog contests election on BJP's ticket, we'll make it win."

"Even if it's a literal dog, we'll make it win."

-You are blindly following him. -No, we are devotees.

We aren't blind, we're devotees."

"I don't think inflation is high."

"I am not wearing an undershirt for the last 10 years, see."

"He is our God, we worship him."

This was possible due to emotional manipulation and brainwashing.

On a large scale, people in this country have been brainwashed.

And the mafia that is brainwashing people,

works in 4 departments.

The first department fills people with pride and arrogance.

You are great because you are a Hindu.

The second department tells you about victimisation.

That your ancestors were victims for thousands of years.

The third department fills you with fear.

That you are in danger.

And the fourth department shows Narendra Modi as the messiah.

Only Narendra Modi can save you.

I talked about the first three departments in 3 videos.

Now, it's time to expose the fourth department.

Narendra Modi's Cult of Personality.

How despite his many failures,

people are emotionally manipulated

into believing him to be God.

Come, let's explore this in today's video.

Friends, in June 2013,

writer Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay,

wrote a book on Narendra Modi.

This was a biography.

In his book, he wrote about how when Narendra Modi was 6 years old,

he sold tea at Vadnagar railway station in Gujarat.

Since then, this story about selling tea,

has been a major talking point in Narendra Modi's struggle.

In 2015, when the Time magazine interviewed PM Modi,

he told them how he came from a poor family.

How he had to sell tea at a railway station in his childhood.

His exact lines were,

"I was born into a very poor family,

As a child, my childhood was steeped in poverty.

For me, poverty was, in a way,

the first inspiration in my life."

But how true is it?

Many people have questioned it.

Look at Narendra Modi's childhood pics.

He was born in 1950.

Did any child born in a poor family back then have such clothes?

Think about it.

He has born suits in his childhood photos.

I was born into a middle-class family in 1994.

But you won't see any pics from my childhood,

where I wore a suit.

And not only poor, Narendra Modi claims that

he came from an extremely poor family.

India Today published this picture of his old home.

It isn't a big house.

But does this look like the home of an extremely poor family during the 1950s?

Narendra Modi has 4 brothers and 1 sister.

2 years later, Narendra Modi's younger brother Prahlad Modi said that

Of the 5 brothers, whose ever turn it would be,

they would go help their father.

Their father sold tea all his life.

Raised Narendra Modi and his siblings.

That's why Narendra Modi should be called the son of a tea seller.

This is the writers' fault.

"All of us brothers sold tea.

My father sold tea all his life.

All his life.

That's why, the correct way would be

to address him as a tea seller's son.

Not a tea seller.

This is the reporters' fault."

In 2014, Congress leader Ahmad Patel had said that Narendra Modi wasn't a tea seller,

instead, he was a canteen contractor.

Whether you can believe Congress or not,

but in 2021, BJP unintentionally acknowledged this canteen claim.

Railways Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw

instructed officials that

they beautify a canteen at Vadnagar railway station.

It is mentioned clearly in this India Today article.

There's a photo when you scroll down,

or this tea stall/canteen.

That was run by Narendra Modi's father.

Look at this recent CNN article.

Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay clarified that

Modi's claims of poverty are grossly exaggerated.

It has been taken out of proportion.

Not only this, in another article, Nilanjan claims

that Narendra Modi's father had enough money

to send Modi and his brothers to school.

And going to school means that the child cannot work full-time anywhere.

He would sometimes help out his father after school.

This might give rise to a question,

why are such stories exaggerated for the public?

Nilanjan says that it happens so that

an idea can be sold to the Indian public.

"Friends, in my childhood,

I used to sell tea on trains.

And now, I'm standing in front of you.

If any person thinks rationally about it,

they'll know that it doesn't make any difference.

A good leader can be from a poor family or a rich family.

And the same can be said about

a bad leader or a d!ctator.

As an example, Cambodia's d!ctator,

Pol Pot came from a rich family.

But Italian d!ctator Benito Mussolini was born into a poor family.

His father was a blacksmith.

And he expressed these facts proudly,

about how he rose from the masses.

Russian d!ctator Joshep Stalin's father was a cobbler.

He made shoes.

And his mother was a washerwoman.

The world's most infamous d!ctator, H,

was born into a poor family too.

But being born into a poor family doesn't mean that

he worked for the welfare of the poor people in his career.

On the other hand, H ran his own money-grabbing schemes and rackets.

During his rule, many crony capitalist companies

earned millions in profits.

I.G. Farben, Deutsche Bank, BMW,

some car companies that you'd know,

some people are crazy about these cars.

Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen,

all of them funded H during his rule.

In 2016, BMW apologised for this.

Look at this article.

They expressed regret for supporting H at one point.

In India, we have seen the Electoral Bond scam recently.

I made a video on how

this isn't a standalone scam, rather it is a consolidation of scams.

Many companies profited from this.

But the common people suffered.

Over the last 10 years, PM Modi's friends,

like Gautam Adani,

kept getting richer beyond imagination.

And 800 million poor people in our nation

were forced to depend on 5 kg of free grains.

Unemployment and inflation have crippled poor people.

Now, the situation is that

Narendra Modi, while talking about being from a poor family,

projected Rahul Gandhi as a person from the Elite sections of society,

calling him a Prince,

that Rahul Gandhi is now telling the poor citizens,

that he thinks about the poor, while Modi thinks of oligarchs like Ambani and Adani.

"When he gives millions to Adani without him having to work hard for it,

it's called development.

When we started the MGNREGA scheme,

we paid labourers for their hard work,

they said that we're spoiling the poor citizens.

I think about you.

They think of them."

Rahul claims that the amount Narendra Modi gave Adani,

he will give the same amount to the poor citizens in India.

"I am telling the country again,

as much as Mr Narendra Modi gave them,

we will pay the same amount to India's poor masses.

Through the Mahalaxmi Yojna, Pehli Naukri Pukki Yojna,

we'll give ₹100,000 to millions of people.

They made 22 billionaires,

we'll make sure millions of people have ₹100,000 at least."

PM Modi hasn't been able to rebuke this.

Rather, he tried to say that

Adani and Ambani are actually colluding with Congress.

in this election,

how much have they been paid from Ambani and Adani?"

Look at this report from March.

The income inequality is the highest in 100 years.

Things weren't this bad even during the British rule.

If Rahul Gandhi promised that

he will uplift 220 million poor people out of poverty over the next 5 years,

what's wrong with it?

But PM Modi started taunting him about it.

He doesn't have a vision,

he forced 800 million people to be dependent upon handouts,

and extended this 5 kg free ration scheme for the next 5 years.

They haven't talked about any plans for employment,

nor have they talked about how they'll control inflation,

they haven't talked about how they'll eradicate poverty.

But when Rahul Gandhi talked about employment for all,

PM Modi started making fun of him.

"Congress's Prince,

made an announcement,

you will laugh at it,

shall I tell you?

You'll have to laugh at it then."

"You know that they send money in tempos.

Is that your personal experience?"

In February 2020, in Gujarat,

the Namaste Trump event took place.

So to hide the poverty and poor people,

a 1,600-foot-long wall was built.

Think about it, 1995 to 2020,

In Gujarat, BJP was in government for 25 years,

Of which, for 3 terms Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister.

But they couldn't eradicate poverty in their state.

Rather, they hid the poor.

The same thing happened in Delhi during the G20 summit.

Some slums were hidden behind a green screen,

restricting the movement of the poor people living there.

"This is why the shops have been hidden.

The unkempt houses have also been hidden."

Think about how dehumanising this is.

It's like someone telling you that you are like a blemish.

And when the rich foreigners are coming to visit our nation,

you will be hidden behind a veil.

How will you react to this?

Think about how the poor people must have felt then.

"They tell us to go away.

They can tell the poor to go away.

Can they dare to tell that to the rich?"

Due to all this, Narendra Modi's "poor family" branding,

has almost dried up.

But this is just one part of his cult of personality.

The second part is about his family.

On WhatsApp and through the pro-government media,

you are repeatedly told that

Narendra Modi is so great

because he left his family for the nation.

He abandoned his wife.

Well, this is a personal matter.

It's not a big deal if a couple don't want to live together.

This happens to many people.

But these people drag this personal matter into public,

to show it as an achievement.

Abandoning his wife for the country.

Does it make any sense?

Former Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri,

did not abandon his wife.

So could he not work for the nation?

Everyone knows about Mahatma Jyotirao Phule's wife Savitribai Phule.

Has he not made a great contribution to our nation?

If you have watched Ram Leela,

you would have seen how Sita supported Ram during his exile.

And Ram didn't stop at anything to save her.

What is this WhatsApp University's anti-woman mentality?

Where a woman is seen as a hindrance.

Where abandoning one's wife is seen as an achievement.

And not only his wife,

WhatsApp mafia says this about Narendra Modi's family too.

Let alone others,

Narendra Modi keeps repeating this again and again.

He says that he left his family for this country.

"My fellow citizens,

I left my home, family, everything, for this country."

Punjab Kesari newspaper wrote his praises

and compared him to Lord Buddha and Mahavir Jain.

But I want to ask them.

Did Lord Buddha leave his home

to make such remarks?

Called someone Congress's widow.

Insulted someone by calling her a "₹500 million girlfriend."

Spread hatred in society.

Lord Buddha didn't do this to get more power.

He was an actual prince.

He left his title, his palace, and the throne to go to the forest.

And behind him, his parents, his wife Yashodhara,

and his son Rahul lived in comfort in the palace.

When Buddha reached enlightenment,

do you what was the first thing he said?

There's a transcript of one of Osho's lectures on OshoNews.com

"When Buddha reached enlightenment,

the first thing he told his disciples was

he wanted to go to Yashodhara,

and talk to her."

His disciple, Ananda, was surprised at this,

he didn't agree with this.

He worried about what people would think.

But Buddha said that he had to thank her for her help.

Whatever he could achieve,

he wanted to thank her for being a part of it.

He was indebted to her.

So he went to her.

Yashodhara saw him,

she was angry at him for the last 12 years.

She said that he could have told her before leaving.

That she wouldn't have stopped him.

He should've trusted her.

Buddha apologised and said that he didn't know better.

And now that he knew, he came back.

He told her that something had happened.

He said that his first responsibility was towards her.

That's why he wanted to share his experience with her.

By then, Yashodhara had started tears.

Now look at Prime Minister Modi's Instagram account.

He attended Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas' wedding reception,

congratulated them.

Look at this video.

In Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma's wedding reception,

he gave them roses.

He went to Malayalam actor Suresh Gopi's daughter's wedding.

To Times Now anchor Navika Kumar's son's wedding.

When Mukesh Ambani started a hospital,

he went there to congratulate him.

Look at this news article too.

Narendra Modi attended Gautam Adani's son

Karan's grand engagement ceremony.

He has the time to attend weddings of Bollywood celebrities and oligarchs.

It's not wrong, per se,

he can attend these events if he wants to.

But my question is,

does a person need to leave only his brothers and family to serve his country?

Look at this ABC article.

Avani Dias reports that in October 2023

the Modi family came together for his nephew's engagement.

But one person wasn't there.

Narendra Modi

You would have seen photos and videos,

of Prime Minister Modi going to meet his mother.

That's great!

But have you ever noticed that

there would be only three people there.

Prime Minister Modi,

his mother,

and the cameraman.

Sometimes there would be 2-3 other people,

but those would be other cameramen.

3 years ago, BBC correspondent Tejas Vaidya

talked to PM Modi's brother Prahlad Modi.

Here's what he had to say.

"He instructs family members to stay away."

There are clear orders about

other family members staying away.

PM Modi's niece, Sonal Modi, said the same thing.

That they're asked to stay away.

She was asked that though many people were invited to the oath ceremony,

why weren't they invited?

Here's what she had to say.

"During Narendra Modi's oath ceremony as the Prime Minister,

many people were invited to witness that,

were you invited then?

Did you want to attend?"

"Everyone wanted to attend.

But unfortunately, we weren't invited."

G20's theme was

Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,

One Earth One Family,

but his own family,

but his own siblings,

are kept at a distance like this.

Why so?

Lord Ram lived with his family.

Ram, Bharat, Lakshman, and Shatrughan,

there was so much love among these 4 brothers.

Does this mean that

King Ram couldn't help his subjects?

He established the Ram Rajya.

When there were no poor, unemployed, or downtrodden people.

Again, this is Prime Minister Modi's personal matter.

If he wants to have relationships with people from Bollywood, Ambani, and Adani,

and not with his family,

His choice.

I have no problem with this.

The problem is that

why is this portrayed as an achievement?

That he abandoned his family.

And that he is great for doing so.

Is this an achievement?

The side effect of this is that

many Hindu youngsters have been brainwashed.

Ideally, they should want to study well and work hard.

They should aim to start earning and looking after their parents.

But no, things are so bad that some youngsters,

are happy with waving swords in front of mosques.

They don't care about their families, their parents.

Selling point #1 was that he was from a poor family.

Selling point #2 is

that he abandoned his family for the country.

And the selling point #3 is him being a holy beggar.

Narendra Modi often says that

he survived for a long time on charity.

Sometimes he says it was for 35 years,

sometimes he says 40 years.

"For nearly 40 years,

I went about begging for food."

"For 35 years,

I went about begging for food."

Well, it might have been a slip of the tongue.

Whether it's 35 years or 40 years,

he might have been confused.

The point is, he became an MLA in 2002.

He was then around 52 years old.

Before that, in the 1990s,

He could somehow afford to go on foreign tours.

In this photo, he is standing in front of the Eiffel Tower in Paris.

This was in front of the White House.

This is from Hollywood, USA.

He went to London and Malaysia too.

Could someone living on people's charity

afford foreign tours in the 1990s?

In the meanwhile,

Narendra Modi got his BA and MA degrees allegedly,

how?

You tell me.

In 1990, the Dycam Model 1 was released.

Launched in the US, this was the first commercially

available digital camera launched in the world.

But PM Modi told us in an interview that

that he used a digital camera for the first time

in 1987-1988.

"I used a digital camera for the first time."

"It was in 1987 or 1988, I think."

He went on foreign tours on what he received as charity,

and bought a digital camera,

before the digital camera was released.

That's unheard of.

"Wow, Mr Modi, wow. Wow!"

A songwriter who pawned off his pen said that

he is otherworldly.

"You are otherworldly."

At times, Narendra Modi claims that

he is a holy beggar,

he'll pack his bags and leave.

"I'm a faqir (holy beggar),

I'll leave with only the bare minimum."

But have you seen a beggar anywhere in the world,

who wears sunglasses worth ₹140,000?

He made his aged mother stand in a line during demonetisation.

While he goes about in ₹120 million Mercedes.

On one hand, our country saw a Prime Minister like Shastri.

It's said that he had only 2 sets of outfits.

When they were torn beyond repair,

he made them into handkerchiefs.

But look at these photos from PM Modi's US visit.

He changed outfits 4 times a day.

Look at this article from The Print.

While travelling to Uttarakhand and Himachal,

PM Modi changed outfits 4 times in 8 hours.

Look at this article from The Times of India.

When PM Modi went to offer his prayers at River Ganga,

he kept changing outfits.

Hubballi Times created a collage for his fancy dress collection.

India Today showed his collection of 22 headwear in this article.

And look at this collage from The Indian Express.

If being a holy beggar doesn't impress people,

the next weapon is,

turning him into god incarnate.

Not once, not twice,

but so many times, numerous politicians,

compared PM Modi to God.

"PM Modi is God's gift to India."

"God has come on Earth in human form as Narendra Modi."

"Our Honourable Prime Minister,

is God incarnate."

"Lord Ram has taken birth as PM Modi."

"PM Modi is the incarnation of god."

"Modi is Ram and Amit Shah is Krishna."

Some people have even built temples.

In Pune, a BJP worker built a temple for Narendra Modi.

There's another temple in Gujarat.

And one in Tamil Nadu.

What nonsense is this?

He isn't the only politician

who is compared to God.

At one point, Adolf H was

compared to Jesus.

H entry into politics was compared to

Jesus's resurrection.

But they were confused about how to make it work,

because Jesus was the symbol of peace.

Even when he was crucified,

he harboured no hatred for others.

He asked God to forgive them.

While H dealt in hatred.

So how could they use Jesus

to spread more hatred,

while continuing to compare him.

For this, H and the Ns,

changed the Bible.

I'm not kidding.

The Old Testament of the Bible was omitted during his rule.

And Jesus was portrayed in a contorted way that

to show him as a fighter fighting against the J.

Similarly, people from BJP refer to Narendra Modi as God,

but the same problem arises.

Narendra Modi spreads hatred.

But on Lord Ram's face, you can see

gentleness, kindness, and empathy.

Look at Raja Ravi Verma's iconic painting.

Ram Darbaar.

This is worshipped in millions of homes in our country.

To find the solution to this problem,

their people have started changing how Ram looks.

Over the last few years, you would have seen,

the iconography of angry Hanuman and angry Ram.

These stickers are on vehicles,

to show that this is the real Lord Ram.

They changed god's character.

There's no mention of Muslims in Ramayana,

but these people have contorted the Ramayana,

for their hate-filled agenda.

In 2016, a BJP MP said that

Muslims are the descendants of Ravana.

The WhatsApp mafia inserted a false quote in our Hindu scriptures.

"Violence is the foremost duty."

This isn't in any Veda or scriptures.

Neither in Ramayana nor Mahabharata.

They forced their agenda or hatred into this.

"Violence is the foremost duty.

You will be pleased to know that

this isn't written in any scripture.

And this should put you on alert.

What is this centralised conspiracy unit,

that is carrying out conspiracies of this scale,

things that aren't even mentioned in the scriptures,

they wrote it in Sanskrit,

and circulated it everywhere through WhatsApp and other platforms."

Friends, the truth is that,

these people have started to contort our Hindu religion

for their agenda of hate.

But now, many Hindus have understood their agenda.

Manipulating our religion like this

isn't sitting well with people.

This is why, this card is starting to fail now.

So these BJP workers decided

to demote him to one level below the incarnation-level,

and show him as a perfect, omnipotent superhero.

And the easiest way to turn someone into a superhero,

is to show the opponents as incompetent fools.

That's why their IT cell,

shows Rahul Gandhi as an incompetent Pappu.

On WhatsApp, his clips are taken out of context, and edited in a way that

to show that Rahul Gandhi doesn't understand anything.

As if he is the greatest fool.

But the truth is that

Over the last 10 years, PM Modi didn't hold even a single press conference.

Didn't give any unscripted interviews.

Whereas, Rahul Gandhi

gave lectures at places ranging from Delhi University to Harvard University.

Had numerous unscripted interactions with people.

It's true that there are some funny clips of him saying weird things.

"This morning,

I got up at night."

But there are similar clips of Narendra Modi too.

"Third, I spoke about women deldevleled development."

Narendra Modi was the one who

talked about using gutter fumes to make tea.

He says that massaging his face with his sweat is the secret behind his glow.

He has also denied climate change,

temperatures aren't rising,

our heat tolerance is lowering.

He has also talked about blocking radar signals using clouds.

"I said that there are so many clouds,

it was raining too,

it was a benefit.

We could hide from the radar."

Even if he doesn't know some things,

he is still so arrogant

that he doesn't know when he is lacking.

Once, Modi was visiting another country,

where India's National Anthem was being played,

and he started walking during it.

Anyone can make an honest mistake like this.

But my point here is that

there are many funny clips of PM Modi.

Before calling others Pappu,

he needs to watch his clips.

Now, an amazing opportunity has presented itself.

Former judges of our Supreme Court

invited Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi for a one-on-one debate.

Rahul Gandhi has already accepted this invitation.

But Narendra Modi is still silent.

If this happens, it will be a straightforward opportunity for the people,

to judge between Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi,

who is more intellectual, intelligent, and a capable leader for our country.

But if Narendra Modi runs away from this debate or doesn't respond to it,

then you'll have your answer about who is better.

In this cult of personality, PM Modi's biggest card is

having his face plastered everywhere.

As a child, I wondered,

why were there so many TV ads for drinks like Coca-Cola?

Everyone knew about Coca-Cola.

Later I realised that

out of sight is out of mind.

If you don't see it, you don't think about it.

There's a related tactics too.

The longer you remain in sight,

the more people would think about you.

There's Narendra Modi in newspapers,

Narendra Modi on radio,

Narendra Modi on TV Channels,

Narendra Modi on Facebook,

Narendra Modi on petrol pump hoardings.

There are posters beside roads,

they've paid millions to Google Ads to plaster his face everywhere.

On the advertisement of every government scheme.

And not only these,

Narendra Modi was even on the Covid vaccine certificates.

They've installed selfie points in so many places.

Look at this report from 2022.

I&B Ministry reported that

over 8 years, the government has,

spent more than ₹64.91 billion on advertisements.

They paid ₹7.1 million each day to print ads in newspapers.

Government funds were used to run these ads.

Additionally, there were ads paid for by the party funds.

Also, there were pro-government news anchors,

who kept on bootlicking him day and night.

Narendra Modi is everywhere.

There was a singer Jim Morrison,

he said that whoever controls the media,

controls people's minds.

Another singer, Bob Marley,

said that you can fool everyone at all times.

So now, people are fed up with seeing Modi's face everywhere.

And these stories about stopping wars,

he is now asked if he could stop wars between foreign nations,

why can't he stop the violence in Manipur?

"It's Electoral Bond's money,

it has to be used somewhere,

they'll have some actor play the daughter's role,

who'll then claim that 'Dad' has stopped the war."

"Why isn't 'Dad' stopping Manipur's violence?"

People are asking, if everything's perfectly fine in India,

then why did a record-breaking 225,000 people

give up their Indian citizenship in 2022?

The biggest evidence of the end of "Modi magic" is that

BJP has to recruit politicians from other parties

who are accused of large-scale corruption.

Had the "Modi Magic" continued,

Modi's name would have been enough to win this year's elections.

They didn't need to recruit politicians from other parties.

They wouldn't need to lie or spread fear and hatred.

In this video, I showed that side of Narendra Modi

which is shown by the WhatsApp mafia.

In the next video, I will show you,

his real face.

Things that are going on in his mind.

Here, I'd like to thank you,

because you are passionately trying

to destroy their factory of lies and hate.

Continue working on our Mission 100 Crore.

It warms my heart to read comments about

how you shared a video with 850 people on WhatsApp.

Some people played the videos on projector screens,

from Rajasthan's roads to West Bengal.

Someone kept their TV outside in Mumbai,

so that the truth can reach more people.

Please, continue like this.

We need to protect our country's democracy.

We need to protect our country's Constitution.

Don't forget to vote.

And convince 10 people around you to vote.

Vote against this hate and lies.

I do believe that together, we can protect our country.

If this is the first time you heard of the 4 departments of this brainwashing mafia,

do watch this video,

in it I explained about the first department and how they work.

Click here to watch it.

Long live the revolution!

Jai Hind!